Video
Verification for Burglar Alarms

|
Foreword
.
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acknowledgments
.. |
4-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Scope
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
General
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
Definitions
|
7-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
Standard
Procedures
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 Identification of a Video Verification
System
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 Procedure for Alarm Signals Received from
Systems
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 When to Use Video Verification
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 Reviewing
Video................................................................................... |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 Notification
Call
.. |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Recommended Video Implementation
Techniques
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 Monitoring Facilities
Recommendations
.. |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 Field of
View
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 Premise Camera
Position
.. |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 Field of
View
. |
11 |
Foreword
This
standards document is published by the Central Station Alarm Association (CSAA)
and was developed and adopted by a consensus of industry volunteers in
accordance with CSAAs standards development policies and procedures.
CSAA
assumes no responsibility for the use, application or misapplication of this
document. Industry members using this document, particularly those having
participated in its development and adoption, are considered by CSAA to have
waived any right they might otherwise have had to assert claims against CSAA
regarding the development process of this standard.
CSAA
reserves the right to revise this document at any time. Because CSAA policy
requires that every standard be reviewed periodically and be revised,
reaffirmed, or withdrawn, users of this document are cautioned to obtain and use
the most recent edition of this standard. Current information regarding the
revision level or status of this or any other CSAA standard may be obtained by
contacting CSAA.
Requests
to modify this document are welcome at any time from any party, regardless of
membership affiliation with CSAA. Such requests, which must be in writing and
sent to the address set forth below, must clearly
identify
the document and text subject to the proposed modification and should include a
draft of proposed changes with supporting comments. Such requests will be
considered in accordance with CSAA's standards development policies and
procedures.
Written
requests for interpretations of a CSAA standard will be considered in accordance
with CSAA's standards development policies and procedures. While it is the
practice of CSAA staff to process an interpretation request quickly, immediate
responses may not be possible since it is often necessary for the appropriate
standards subcommittee to review the request and develop an appropriate
interpretation.
Requests
to modify a standard, requests for interpretations of a standard, or any other
comments are welcome and may be sent to:
Central
Station Alarm Association
email:
This
document is owned by the Central Station Alarm Association and may not be
reproduced, in whole or part, without the prior written permission from CSAA.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CSAA
Standards Chairman:
Louis T. Fiore, L.T.Fiore, Inc.
CSAA
Committee Chairman: Peter
P. Giacalone, Giacalone Associates, LLC
CSAA
Staff Administrator:
Stephen P. Doyle, Executive Vice President, CSAA
Celia
T. Besore, Director
of Marketing and Communications, CSAA
|
A-1
Security |
Bud
Wulforst* |
|
|
ADT |
Brooke
Smith* |
|
|
ADT |
Tom
Nakatani* |
|
|
ADT |
Larry
Dischert* |
|
|
American
Alarm |
Dick
Sampson |
|
|
Bay
Alarm Company |
Shane
Clary |
|
|
BCSII |
Gail
Branton |
|
|
CSAA |
Celia
Besore |
|
|
D3
Data |
David
Boyce |
|
|
D3
Data |
Don
St. Mary |
|
|
Diebold |
Mark
Burnett |
|
|
Diebold |
Steve
Ipson |
|
|
DMP |
Terry
Shelton |
|
|
DSC |
Dan
Nita |
|
|
DSC |
Kevin
Harris |
|
|
DSC |
Sascha
Kylau |
|
|
Emergency
24 |
Kevin |
|
|
Emergency
24 |
Kevin
McCarthy |
|
|
Emergency
24 |
Patrick
Deveraux* |
|
|
GE
Security |
Kim
Loy |
|
|
Honeywell |
Bridget
Lehmann |
|
|
Honeywell |
Jed
McComber |
|
|
|
christopher
Baskin |
|
|
Marlin
Central Monitoring |
Bary
Brannon |
|
|
Optex,
Inc |
Scott
Simmons |
|
|
Oz
Vision |
Avi
Lupo* |
|
|
Oz
Vision |
Shahar
Belkin |
|
|
Oz
Vision |
Tim
Root |
|
|
Perkins,
Smith & Comel LLP |
Gil
Breiman |
|
|
Permar
Security |
Mike
Schneider |
|
|
Richard
Hahn & Associated |
Derek
Rice |
|
|
Richard
Hahn & Associated |
Richard
Hahn |
|
|
Salilent
Systems |
Per
Hanssen |
|
|
Security
Solutions |
Peter
Orvis* |
|
|
Security
System News |
Derek
Rice |
|
|
Sentinel
Vision |
Mark
Miller* |
|
|
Sentinel
Vision |
Russ
Jones |
|
|
Sentry
Com |
Mike
Belkowitz |
|
|
Sonitrol |
Frank
Minni |
|
|
Teldat |
Austion
Munoz |
|
|
Tyco |
Bernie
Worst* |
|
|
UL |
Steven
Schmit |
|
|
Vector |
John
Murphy |
|
|
Vector |
Rick
Simpson |
|
|
Wayne
Alarm Company |
Ralph
Sevinor |
|
|
|
Dean
Czajka |
|
|
Xtralis |
Kyle
Webbe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Indicates
active members.
This
standard defines methods using video by which false dispatches can be greatly
reduced and notification that an intrusion has occurred can be enhanced.
It has been proven that verifying an alarm signal by a monitoring central
station will considerably reduce false dispatches.
This
standard focuses on how to use video to verify alarm signals and to help
visually identify the source of the alarm event. While it is a goal of this
standard to help in reducing the number of false dispatches; it also is a goal
to provide enhanced information when an alarm needs to be reported to
authorities.
1
Video Verification Scope
This
standard has been prepared under the direction of the Security Industry
Standards Council (SISC) members with the participation of the Central Station
Alarm Association (CSAA) members, and the Security Industry Association (SIA)
members.
The standard is recommended for use by alarm
monitoring facilities and by State and Local governments as a minimum industry
standard for good practice in the use of video for alarm monitoring applications
to aid in alarm verification.
New technologies and successful efforts to reduce
false alarms have led to this standard. The
intent of this standard is to reduce wasteful efforts associated with potential
false alarms. In addition, the
intent is to achieve increased efficiencies while enhancing the quality of the
information presented to the authorities when reporting an alarm.
2 General
If differences exist between this standard and other
written Special Instructions with the monitored premises; the Special
Instructions shall take precedence.
3 Definitions
3.1 Alarm Verification
Alarm verification is a generic name given to many
techniques used (i) to permit authorized personnel to appropriately identify
themselves, thereby preventing emergency response agencies from being requested
to respond to situations that do not represent an emergency; and (ii) to
determine the validity of alarm signals received at a Central Station or
monitoring facility. [1]
3.2 Video Verification
Video Verification is the use of Captured Video or
real time video in which the video information or recording is aligned with the
action that initiated an alarm event to assist in determining the protocol to be
followed for the alarm event.
3.3 Standard Verification
Standard verification is the attempt by monitoring
facility personnel to verify that an emergency does not appear to exist at the
monitored premises, by means of a telephone call, voice contact, or other
electronic means. 1
3.4 Enhanced Verification
Enhanced Verification is the attempt by the
monitoring facility personnel to verify that no emergency appears to exist, at
the monitored premises, by means of more thorough procedures such as 2 (two) or
more verification calls, live audio, video, cross zoning, or a combination of
these procedures.1
3.5 Remote Video Investigation
Remote Video Investigation is the procedure where
monitoring facility personnel uses a live video connection or recorded video
clips, pictures, and other data to remotely view the premises as a follow up
method after an alarm event has been transmitted.
The viewing of video and associated information of the premises occurs
after the initial alarm. In effect
the facility personnel may or may not be viewing the actual activity that
initiated the alarm but are reviewing the video information provided after
receiving the alarm event in an attempt to observe activity that may provide
information about the alarm event. This method can add information to the Alarm
Verification but is not considered verifying an alarm as the video may not
contain information that is captured at the time of the alarm or directly
associated with the alarm event.
3.6 Captured Video Information
Captured Video is associated video information
aligned with the alarm event and/or identified by the monitoring facility
personnel while viewing video. Examples include the following: the presence of
video aligned with the alarm, the identification of a human or humans, or any
other information germane to the alarm scene (broken window, smashed door, or
other physical characteristics) at the time of the alarm event.
3.7 Special Instructions
A written, separate document from the monitoring contract document,
that specifies a specific set of instructions to be followed in the event of an
alarm, between the monitored premises and the alarm/monitoring company.1
3.8 Notification Call
The call to the law enforcement authority, such as 911 or the
telephone number used to reach the responding law enforcement agency.1
3.9 Cross Zoning
The application of redundant detection devices such that one motion
detector or one photo-electric beam paired with some other device such as
another motion detector, photo-electric beam, door contact or door contacts, to
cover generally the same area. An alarm is recognized when both detectors in the
pair are triggered.1
3.10
Captured Frame Video
The
minimum number of frames transmitted shall be 5 (five).
In
applications in which video capture, recording and transmission cannot be
assured to begin within 100 milliseconds (100msec) of the actual time of the
alarm event, then at least 2 (two) frames shall be captured before the event, 1
(one) at the time of the event and 2 (two) after the event.
The
minimum amount of time of captured video shall be 5 (five) seconds.
As
an example if the minimums are implemented, at least 5 frames of captured video
spanning five seconds starting no more than 100 milliseconds after the actual
alarm event will be captured and transmitted. Alternately, in applications where
the time between alarm initiation and recording of the first of the required
five frames cannot be assured to be within 100 milliseconds, then 5 (five)
frames would be distributed over 5 (five) seconds (1 (one) second between
full frames) with two frames containing pre alarm video, the event frame being
the third, and two frames of post event video
4.1 Identification of a Video Verification System
Each
alarm signal with Video Verification shall be identified by the monitoring
facility personnel that additional video information is associated with the
standard alarm signal received.
4.2
Procedure for Alarm Signals Received from Systems
In
accordance with ANSI/CSAA CS-V-01 standard, unless Special Instructions exist,
the monitoring facility personnel shall make contact with the protected premises
for authorized identification and verification upon receiving an alarm.
4.3 When to Use Video Verification
Video information shall be combined with
cross-zoning, audio methods, or verification calls to the premise to identify
personnel or zone patterns that may verify that no emergency exists.
Video information does
not need to be considered in the case when an alternative method of verifying
that no emergency is present supersedes the viewing of the video, such as if the
initial contact with the protected premise finds authorized personnel at the
premises and/or the person states that no emergency exists.
4.4 Reviewing Video
Video information will be reviewed by the monitoring
facility prior to initiating a Notification Call if no other approved
alternative method can verify that an emergency does not exist
4.5 Notification Call
The Notification Call detail will include
information that has been reviewed by the monitoring facility personnel to
indicate whether or not there is Captured Video Information
associated with the alarm event; to indicate
information has been gathered to indicate if an emergency exists.
The details shall include a statement to the effect that the protected
premises does support Video Verification but either no video was associated with
the alarm or the Captured Video Information did not reveal conclusive
information about the alarm.
The quality of the video received shall be of a
nature that a reasonable person should be able to decipher between a human and
non-human based on the attributes of human form or any other information germane
to the alarm scene (broken window, smashed door, or other physical
characteristics) at the time of the alarm event.
5.1 Monitoring Facilities Recommendations
It is recommended that the Captured Video be
transmitted to the monitoring facility when the alarm event is transmitted.
The alarm event and captured video do not need to be transmitted over the
same medium.
The monitoring facility personnel shall have the
Captured Video presented in a manner that is easily accessible.
5.2 Premise Camera Position
The recommendation for the camera placement is to
provide as much coverage of the protected premises as possible.
5.3
Field of View
It is recommended that the Captured Video field of
view include the area covered by the sensor that triggered the alarm event.
If the sensor is a motion sensor then the captured video shall be aligned
with the motion sensors coverage area. The field of view may also be more than
one camera with more than one alarm event.